THE HALFAX HEIMDALL AUGUR

2026-07-10 02:14:02 UTC

← all stories

read story evidence & references

Story · abc_au + alarabiya + aljazeera + bangkokpost + bbc + bluesky + dailysabah + dawn + dw + france24 + gdelt + guardian + hindu + hindustantimes + indianexpress + npr + scmp + tass + theverge + timesofindia + timesofisrael + triblive + websearch + wtae · 176 events

hindustantimes 9d ago 016bad16… source ↗
US birthright citizenship: 5 things to know as SC blocks Trump's controversial order in major ruling
US birthright citizenship: 5 things to know as SC blocks Trump's controversial order in major ruling The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's order that denied citizenship to children born to undocumented immigrants.
wtae 9d ago 070e34d4… source ↗
What the Supreme Court justices said about the birthright citizenship ruling
What the Supreme Court justices said about the birthright citizenship ruling <p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order attempting to limit birthright citizenship. </p>
bbc 9d ago 0cc0cd24… source ↗
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump The ruling is a major setback for Donald Trump's immigration agenda, and has been welcomed by civil rights groups.
websearch 0ebb82f1… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship | CNN Politics
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship | CNN Politics • Birthright citizenship upheld: In a big loss for President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship , striking down his executive order. Chief Justice John Roberts, calling citizenship “the right to have rights,” wrote for the court that “the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today.” Read the full opinion. • Ruling on trans sports: The Supreme Court is letting states ban transgender athletes from playing on girls’ sports teams. The ruling was a major defeat for the LGBTQ movement, and it came a year after the justices allowed states to ban transgender care for minors, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy. • Campaign finance: The court also lifted a Watergate-era cap on how much money political parties may spend in coordination with candidates. • Read more of our key takeaways from the birthright citizenship decision. Here’s what to know and what’s next for transgender athletes. Read more All Catch Up Birthright Citizenship trans sports 48 Posts Link Copied! Scroll through the posts below to learn more abou…
gdelt 10d ago 0f1ae305… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits There are 3 cases we are watching out for today the future of birthright citizenship and 2 cases regarding transgender sports participation. Both decisions could be released in just *** couple of hours. Birthright citizenship grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil under the 14th Amendment. This was challenged on the first day of President Donald Trump's 2nd term. When he signed an executive order to invalidate how the amendments interpreted, the president's order would deny citizenship to anyone born in the US on or after February 19, 2025 whose parents are in the country illegally or temporarily. Experts argue the decision could impact *** quarter of *** million children born in the US each year. The Supreme Court's also expected to release. *** decision soon on cases that challenge laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on their grade school and college sports teams. More than 2 dozen Republican-led states, including Idaho and West Virginia, have enacted bans on transgender athletes …
gdelt 10d ago 116a1b9b… source ↗
WASHINGTON rejected PRESIDENT in New Hampshire, United States
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
gdelt 10d ago 12b78438… source ↗
CITIZEN made statement SUPREME COURT in New Hampshire, United States
A divided US Supreme Court has upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the United States, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The 6-3rulingmarked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a ‌major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his global tariffs. "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights - to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, "We keep that promise today". The justices upheld a lower court's decision that blocked Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is a US citizen or legal pe…
gdelt 10d ago 13816f8e… source ↗
UNITED STATES consulted CHINA in San Francisco, California, United States
NPR National News Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds NPR | By Nina Totenberg Published June 30, 2026 at 10:38 AM EDT Bluesky Threads Email Drew Angerer / Getty Images The U.S. Supreme Court Listen to NPR's live special coverage of the decision Loading... In a sharp rebuke to President Trump, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Constitution guarantees automatic birthright citizenship to virtually all children born in the United States. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court's 6-3 opinion. The decision firmly rejected the executive order that Trump issued on the first day of his second term. It sought to bar citizenship for babies born in the U.S. to parents who either entered the country illegally or who are living and working here legally with temporary visas. The executive order never went into effect because every lower court judge who reviewed it concluded, in the words of one judge, that it was "blatantly unconstitutional." Trump has long maintained that the Constitution does not guarantee birthright citizenship. But as Chief Justice Roberts observed, the men who wrote the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution…
gdelt 10d ago 13c33aed… source ↗
The United States Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the attempts of President Donald Trump to curtail birthright citizenship, a rejection of his most aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration.
The United States Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the attempts of President Donald Trump to curtail birthright citizenship, a rejection of his most aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. The court, in a 6-3 decision, struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order that would have undercut the concept that any person born on American soil is automatically a citizen. The right to citizenship for all persons born or naturalised in the United States is enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the US constitution. But Trump had sought to limit it on the first day of his second term in office. “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land’. We keep that promise today,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. Recall that lower courts had already put Trump’s order on hold while the case was heard. The President’s public attitude towards the court has soured since the tariffs ruling, even though he appointed three of its nine justices. The Republican has repeatedly lashed out at it and predicted the justices would hand him a …
gdelt 9d ago 186c81ba… source ↗
ADMINISTRATION made statement UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago 1992b7c1… source ↗
BREAKING: The Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits. (via @apnews.com)
bluesky 9d ago 19f82dd9… source ↗
BREAKING: the Supreme Court has retained birthright citizenship. Children born here to non-citizen parents are US citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment. A blow to Trump’s deportation agenda.
gdelt 10d ago 1a08b71f… source ↗
WASHINGTON rejected UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
gdelt 10d ago 203c78a1… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
websearch 221ad101… source ↗
What to know about birthright citizenship ahead of Supreme Court's ...
What to know about birthright citizenship ahead of Supreme Court's ... The ruling is one of the most highly anticipated of the year. The U.S. Supreme Court isexpected to weigh inthis week onPresident Donald Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenshipby executive order, a move which would upend more than a century of legalprecedent and a national tradition that have said babies born on American soil are automatically American citizens. The ruling, one of themost highly anticipated of the year, is a major test of Trump's unprecedented assertion ofpresidentialpower in his second term with major stakes formillions of children and their families. What is birthright citizenship? Birthright citizenshipis the idea that a child automatically becomes a citizen of the country in which they are born, regardless of the immigration status of theirparents. It reflects the principle ofjus soli, or right of the soil, extending citizenship purely on the basis of geographic location. By contrast, many countries extend citizenship under the principle ofjus sanguinis,or right of blood, which is determined by the nationality of a child's parents regardless of the location of birth. How does bi…
bluesky 9d ago 22566d15… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules AGAINST Trump's EO limiting birthright citizenship. The vote is 6-3.
websearch 2405acc5… source ↗
Trump's biggest Supreme Court test this term? Birthright citizenship ...
Trump's biggest Supreme Court test this term? Birthright citizenship ... PresidentDonald Trumpis set to face a series of crucialSupreme Courtrulings over the next two weeks, with decisions expected on several cases that could significantly impact his administration's immigration policies, presidential powers and governing agenda. According to NBC News, the US Supreme Court has 20 cases left to decide before concluding its current term at the end of June. Among the most closely watched are challenges involving Trump's effort to restrict birthright citizenship, his attempts to remove officials from independent federal agencies and his administration's hard-lineimmigration policies. The rulings come months after the Supreme Court dealt Trump a setback by blocking his sweeping tariff policy in February. While legal experts expect the administration to lose some of the pending cases, others could reinforce the president's efforts to expand executive authority. Here's a look at the key Trump-related cases awaiting decisions. The most anticipated ruling concerns Trump's effort to reinterpret the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment. The administration argues that children born …
websearch 26f982a5… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's ...
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's ... Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, reaffirming the more than 100-year-old understanding that nearly all of those born in the United States are citizens. In a divided decision in the case Trump v. Barbara, the Supreme Court split 6-3 in finding that Mr. Trump's policy is unlawful. Five of the justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson — agreed that Mr. Trump's executive order violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately to say he believes the order violates federal law. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. With the decision, the Supreme Court has now invalidated a second of Mr. Trump's signature initiatives from his second term, joining its ruling striking down many of his tariffs in February. The president signed his directive aiming to restrict birthright citizenship on his first day back in the White House as part of a sweeping crackdown on immigration. "Citizensh…
websearch 2a403452… source ↗
14th Amendment: Birthright Ruling Won't Stand 'Test of ... - Newsweek
14th Amendment: Birthright Ruling Won't Stand 'Test of ... - Newsweek By Gabe Whisnant News Editor 0 Share Newsweek is a Trust Project member See more of our trusted coverage when you search. Prefer Newsweek on Google to see more of our trusted coverage when you search. The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a decisive blow to President Donald Trump ’s effort to restrict birthright citizenship on Tuesday, ruling that his executive order could not override the Constitution ’s guarantee of citizenship to those born on U.S. soil. The 6-3 decision in Trump v. Barbara , authored by Chief Justice John Roberts , marked a major check of presidential power and reaffirms long-standing interpretations of the 14th Amendment. It also has sweeping implications for immigration policy, affecting potentially hundreds of thousands of children born in the United States each year. "Citizenship, then and now," Roberts wrote, "was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land.' We keep that promise today." Legal experts have said the ruling underscores that any fundamental change to …
websearch 2b259cea… source ↗
Groups Representing Plaintiffs Respond to Supreme Court ...
Groups Representing Plaintiffs Respond to Supreme Court ... June 30, 2026 11:15 am WASHINGTON— In a major victory, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship is unconstitutional. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and the Democracy Defenders Fund brought the successful challenge inTrump v. Barbaraon behalf of children who would have been denied citizenship under the order. In its 6-to-3 decision, the court struck down the president’s 2025 executive order, which sought to strip citizenship from American children born to undocumented parents. The decision reaffirms that birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution and rejects President Trump’s attempt to redefine who is an American citizen through executive action. The following are reactions to today’s ruling: “The court’s decision reaffirms a fundamental American promise — if you are born here, you are a citizen,” saidACLU National Legal Director Cecillia Wang, who argued the case at the Supreme Court.“A president cannot change the Const…
bluesky 9d ago 2b55df1a… source ↗
SUCK IT Trump!! #scotus #breakingnews apnews.com/live/birthri... IN: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
gdelt 10d ago 2c72bddc… source ↗
CITIZEN engaged materially SUPREME COURT in New Hampshire, United States
A divided US Supreme Court has upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the United States, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The 6-3rulingmarked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a ‌major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his global tariffs. "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights - to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, "We keep that promise today". The justices upheld a lower court's decision that blocked Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is a US citizen or legal pe…
gdelt 9d ago 2d16acb5… source ↗
UNITED STATES made statement UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
france24 9d ago 3000431c… source ↗
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship
bluesky 9d ago 3426df26… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump's Extreme Agenda - Discussion with Rep. Veronica Escobar, Olivia Troye and Adam Klasfeld open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
gdelt 9d ago 34456590… source ↗
UNITED STATES fought in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago 344f1c02… source ↗
Breaking News - The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's proposed limits.
gdelt 10d ago 35dbf5f4… source ↗
UNITED STATES appealed CONGRESS in White House, District of Columbia, United States
News National Politics Actions Facebook Tweet Email Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case on the first day of his second term. Prev Next The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case. (Scripps News) By: Scripps News Group Posted and last updated The Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship for children born in the United States, including those born to undocumented migrants. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | States can ban transgender athletes from participating in women's sports, Supreme Court rules The ruling was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the court's three liberal justices in the majority. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment in part and dissented in part, while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case on the first day of his second term…
gdelt 10d ago 361b5310… source ↗
UNITED STATES coerced ADMINISTRATION in New Hampshire, United States
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
gdelt 9d ago 3621d838… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 10d ago 3756adbd… source ↗
NATURALIZED fought UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits There are 3 cases we are watching out for today the future of birthright citizenship and 2 cases regarding transgender sports participation. Both decisions could be released in just *** couple of hours. Birthright citizenship grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil under the 14th Amendment. This was challenged on the first day of President Donald Trump's 2nd term. When he signed an executive order to invalidate how the amendments interpreted, the president's order would deny citizenship to anyone born in the US on or after February 19, 2025 whose parents are in the country illegally or temporarily. Experts argue the decision could impact *** quarter of *** million children born in the US each year. The Supreme Court's also expected to release. *** decision soon on cases that challenge laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on their grade school and college sports teams. More than 2 dozen Republican-led states, including Idaho and West Virginia, have enacted bans on transgender athletes …
bluesky 9d ago 3b633515… source ↗
BREAKING: The Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote UPHOLDS birthright citizenship, affirming the default rule that all persons born in the United States (with narrow exceptions) are U.S. citizens at birth. A ...
BREAKING: The Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote UPHOLDS birthright citizenship, affirming the default rule that all persons born in the United States (with narrow exceptions) are U.S. citizens at birth. A total LOSS for President Trump and the effort to rewrite the 14th Amendment.
bluesky 9d ago 3c77c48f… source ↗
BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4...
BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4 on the constitutional question and 6-3 on whether federal law protects birthright citizenship.
dawn 8d ago 3d91c271… source ↗
Supreme Court spurns Trump on birthright citizenship
Supreme Court spurns Trump on birthright citizenship <p>WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship in a blow to one of his signature anti-immigration initiatives.</p> <p>The court, in an eagerly awaited decision on the final day of its term, ruled 6-3 to maintain the right to American citizenship for nearly everyone born on US soil.</p> <p>Trump signed an executive order last year on the first day of his second stint in the White House decreeing that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become US citizens.</p> <p>Lower courts blocked the move by the Republican president, ruling that under the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amend­ment to the US Constitution nearly everyone born on US soil is an American citizen.</p> <blockquote> <p>US president hails ‘big win’ in transgender sports case</p> </blockquote> <p>The Supreme Court agreed in a majority opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts that was joined by two other conservative justices and the three liberals on the top court.</p> <p>“Children born in the United States to parents unla…
bluesky 9d ago 3dfc874b… source ↗
"[T]he Supreme Court’s decision to uphold birthright citizenship in a major blow to Trump’s agenda." Hardly, since Trump will, of course, ignore the ruling and enforce his Executive Order anyway. www...
"[T]he Supreme Court’s decision to uphold birthright citizenship in a major blow to Trump’s agenda." Hardly, since Trump will, of course, ignore the ruling and enforce his Executive Order anyway. www.thebulwark.com/p/breaking-s...
gdelt 9d ago 3fa803ba… source ↗
UNITED STATES engaged diplomatically CITIZEN in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
websearch 42a3820d… source ↗
SCOTUS to rule on birthright citizenship. And, U.S. murder rate nears ...
SCOTUS to rule on birthright citizenship. And, U.S. murder rate nears ... NPR News SCOTUS to rule on birthright citizenship. And, U.S. murder rate nears new low NPR | By Brittney Melton Published June 30, 2026 at 6:46 AM CDT Twitter LinkedIn Email Listen • 12:46 Good morning. You're reading the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day. Today's top stories Today marks the last day of the U.S. Supreme Court's current term , and major rulings are expected. Two key cases involve bans on transgender athletes. The court's possibly most anticipated ruling focuses on birthright citizenship . The case questions whether the U.S. should automatically grant citizenship to children born here, particularly in light of President Trump's executive order to deny citizenship to children whose parents entered the U.S. illegally or are on temporary visas. At the heart of the issue is the 14th Amendment, which states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." Andrew Harnik / Getty Image…
gdelt 10d ago 43595fa4… source ↗
Now
Now 80° Wed 97° Thu 99° Supreme Court strikes down Trump's birthright order; upholds state bans on trans athletes in girls' sports. byAUSTIN DENEAN | The National News Desk WASHINGTON (TNND) —The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn birthright citizenship, dealing a blow to his plans to crack down on immigration in the United States. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional. Birthright citizenshipgrants anyone born in the United States American citizenship, regardless of their immigration status, with some exceptions for children of foreign diplomats. It became law in 1868 with the ratification of the 14th Amendment in the aftermath in the civil war. It was expanded in the late 1800s when the Supreme Court ruled a man born in the U.S. to Chinese parents had a right to U.S. citizenship. The high court has made rulings in later cases that anyone born in the country is a citizen regardless of their parents’ immigration status. The 14th Amendment says, “all persons born or naturalized in the U.S., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Lower courts and the S…
npr 9d ago 437b8724… source ↗
What the Supreme Court did on the final day of its term
What the Supreme Court did on the final day of its term The Supreme Court upheld the right of children born on U.S. soil to automatic American citizenship. In so doing, the court rejected President Trump's most aggressive attempt to limit immigration.
bluesky 9d ago 44330070… source ↗
MAJOR BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has just ended Trump's ban on Birthright Citizenship, siding with our 14th Amendment. In other words Trump continues to go against the US Constitution and SCOTUS...
MAJOR BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has just ended Trump's ban on Birthright Citizenship, siding with our 14th Amendment. In other words Trump continues to go against the US Constitution and SCOTUS continues to pushed back.
gdelt 10d ago 46207485… source ↗
UNITED STATES assaulted PRESIDENT in New Hampshire, United States
Published- June 30, 2026 08:24 pm IST - WASHINGTON Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan "Born in the USA = citizen!" outside the U.S. Supreme Court building. File. | Photo Credit: Reuters The Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 30, 2026) upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting PresidentDonald Trump’s executive orderdeclaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The Justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican President's restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal Justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom. The case framed another test of Mr. Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majorit…
abc_au 9d ago 4a7cb84c… source ↗
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship Donald Trump's controversial attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the US is rejected by the Supreme Court, upending the president's hardline agenda on immigration.
gdelt 9d ago 4ab80973… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
aljazeera 1d ago 50991ae7… source ↗
Trump to ask US Supreme Court for new hearing on birthright citizenship
Trump to ask US Supreme Court for new hearing on birthright citizenship In June, the Supreme Court ruled against Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship for individuals born in the US.
gdelt 10d ago 51490cc2… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
bluesky 9d ago 5258e3bf… source ↗
🔴 BREAKING: The Supreme Court is poised to decide whether Trump can unilaterally gut birthright citizenship, turning the final ruling day of the term into a fight over who counts as American, who gets...
🔴 BREAKING: The Supreme Court is poised to decide whether Trump can unilaterally gut birthright citizenship, turning the final ruling day of the term into a fight over who counts as American, who gets to decide, and how far presidential power can be pushed before the Constitution snaps.
gdelt 10d ago 54ed5676… source ↗
SUPREME COURT rejected PRESIDENT in New Hampshire, United States
Published- June 30, 2026 08:24 pm IST - WASHINGTON Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan "Born in the USA = citizen!" outside the U.S. Supreme Court building. File. | Photo Credit: Reuters The Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 30, 2026) upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting PresidentDonald Trump’s executive orderdeclaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The Justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican President's restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal Justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom. The case framed another test of Mr. Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majorit…
guardian 21d ago 56304c40… source ↗
Supreme court to release opinions with several high-stakes rulings to come including birthright citizenship – US politics live
Supreme court to release opinions with several high-stakes rulings to come including birthright citizenship – US politics live <p>Trump’s immigration agenda is on the supreme court docket with rulings still to come on birthright citizenship and TPS for Haitian and Syrian immigrants</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/17/sign-up-for-the-breaking-news-us-email-to-get-newsletter-alerts-direct-to-your-inbox?utm_medium=ACQUISITIONS_STANDFIRST&amp;utm_campaign=BN22326&amp;utm_content=signup&amp;utm_term=standfirst&amp;utm_source=GUARDIAN_WEB">Sign up for the Breaking News US email</a></p></li></ul><p>Hello and welcome to the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/us-politics">US politics</a> live blog.</p><p><strong>The supreme court is expected </strong><strong> to render at least one judgment today as the term is set to come to an end later this month. There are a series of cases yet to be decided that are relevant to Donald Trump, including his attempt to limit birthright citizenship and plan to remove legal protection from Haitian and Syrian immigrants.</strong></p><p>Donald Trump has signed a 14-point agreement with Iran, claiming it delivered a “…
bluesky 9d ago 56ef8e58… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme...
gdelt 10d ago 57eaa5f3… source ↗
SUPREME COURT engaged materially UNITED STATES in United States
Now 78° Wed 96° Thu 96° byALEXX ALTMAN-DEVILBISS | The National News Desk (TNND) —Supreme Court justices are expected to deliver their final opinions on Tuesday ahead of the court's summer recess, and the biggest decision — President Donald Trump's attempt toend birthright citizenship— has yet to be announced. At the center of the dispute is the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, which states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," are U.S. citizens. The Supreme Court's 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark has long been interpreted as guaranteeing birthright citizenship to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil, with limited exceptions, such as children of foreign diplomats. Trump signed the birthright citizenshipexecutive orderon Jan. 20, 2025, just hours after being sworn in for his second term. His order argues that children born to noncitizen parents who are either in the country unlawfully or who have temporary legal status, such as tourists or foreign students, are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. and are therefore ineligible for automatic citizenship. The policy wasi…
gdelt 9d ago 59483a67… source ↗
UNITED STATES coerced ADMINISTRATION in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bbc 9d ago 5ce82440… source ↗
US Supreme Court has dealt heavy defeats to Trump, while expanding his power
US Supreme Court has dealt heavy defeats to Trump, while expanding his power The birthright ruling brings to an end a Supreme Court term that has delivered the president some key victories.
france24 9d ago 5d5f8c2b… source ↗
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship The US Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting US President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States temporarily or without legal documents are not American citizens.
dw 9d ago 5ef1af08… source ↗
US Supreme Court rules against Trump executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rules against Trump executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship US President Donald Trump had issued an executive order that would have changed constitutional guarantees that people born on US soil are citizens.
dailysabah 9d ago 5f264131… source ↗
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to curb birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to curb birthright citizenship The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's effort to restrict birthright citizenship, dealing a major setback to one of his signature immigration poli...
timesofisrael 9d ago 5f9b8ed8… source ↗
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits <p>In 6-3 decision, judges annull executive order saying kids of those illegally or temporarily in the US are not American citizens; bare majority of 5 rule it violates Constitution</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-supreme-court-upholds-birthright-citizenship-rejecting-trumps-proposed-limits/">US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com">The Times of Israel</a>.</p> <figure><img src="https://static-cdn.toi-media.com/www/uploads/2026/06/AP26177667296445-1024x640.jpg" title="US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits" border="0" width="160" height="100" class="type:primaryImage"></figure>
abc_au 8d ago 5fc2ebd6… source ↗
What the Supreme Court ruling means for Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship
What the Supreme Court ruling means for Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship While it's a blow to the US president, the highest court's narrow ruling may have emboldened efforts to overturn birthright citizenship through other avenues.
theverge 9d ago 615745b7… source ↗
The Supreme Court stops Trump&#8217;s attempt to end birthright citizenship
The Supreme Court stops Trump&#8217;s attempt to end birthright citizenship The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, ruling 6-3 against President Donald Trump's effort to end the longstanding constitutional right via executive order. Birthright citizenship dates back to Reconstruction. Under the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 to guarantee citizenship and equal protection to the children of formerly enslaved people, anyone born in the United [&#8230;]
guardian 1d ago 62245bd1… source ↗
Trump to ask US supreme court to reconsider birthright citizenship ruling
Trump to ask US supreme court to reconsider birthright citizenship ruling <p>Request for rehearing comes after Fox News report of Texas hospital advertising maternity services in Mexico</p><p>Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would ask the US supreme court to reconsider <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf">its ruling</a> that the 14th amendment to the US constitution guarantees birthright citizenship in light of what he described as shocking new evidence: a hospital in Texas advertising its services to expectant mothers in Mexico on a pair of billboards.</p><p>“Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with ‘Deliveries starting at $4000’, <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116886461770041376">the president wrote</a> on his social media platform, in what appeared to be a wild exaggeration of a Fox News report on just two billboards.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/08/trump-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship">Continue reading...</a>
bluesky 9d ago 65544b4d… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump's Extreme Agenda - Discussion with Rep. Veronica Escobar, Olivia Troye and Adam Klasfeld open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
aljazeera 8d ago 68dbe5e4… source ↗
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship: Who wins, who loses?
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship: Who wins, who loses? Court struck down US President Trump&#039;s executive order abolishing it, but he has pledged to challenge the ruling.
france24 9d ago 6acda84e… source ↗
'A big setback for Trump': Supreme Court rejects bid to curb birthright citizenship
'A big setback for Trump': Supreme Court rejects bid to curb birthright citizenship The US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship in a blow to one of his signature anti-immigration initiatives. France 24's Angela DIffley takes a closer look at what she says his a "big setback" for Trump.
hindustantimes 9d ago 6c2bbc79… source ↗
Which Supreme Court justices voted to protect birthright citizenship? The 6-3 split explained
Which Supreme Court justices voted to protect birthright citizenship? The 6-3 split explained Chief Justice John Roberts joined five colleagues to strike down Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship.
bluesky 9d ago 6e7f3914… source ↗
Breaking News: The Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order.
websearch 6e8ef42b… source ↗
Supreme Court Expected to Hand Down Rulings on Birthright Citizenship ...
Supreme Court Expected to Hand Down Rulings on Birthright Citizenship ... Crime & Law Supreme Court Expected to Hand Down Rulings on Birthright Citizenship, Presidential Power and More Blake Thor | June 15, 2026, 7:21 pm The U.S. Supreme Court’s annual “June boom” is about to begin, bringing an end to months of speculation. The justices are poised to hand down decisions in several landmark cases in the weeks ahead. Their rulings could have sweeping implications for birthright citizenship, presidential power, transgender athletes and more. Here’s what to watch for: Thanks to our sponsors: View all sponsors Birthright Citizenship One of the most closely watched cases has been Trump v. Barbara , which scrutinizes an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on his first day of this term in office. Executive Order 14160 targeted the citizenship status of children born in the U.S. to unauthorized immigrant parents or to parents living in the U.S. temporarily. “The Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States,” the order reads. “The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship p…
gdelt 10d ago 6fd8a050… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
hindu 9d ago 73553eaa… source ↗
U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits The birthright citizenship order, which Mr. Trump signed on the first day of his second term, is part of his administration’s broad immigration crackdown
france24 9d ago 739a4579… source ↗
Supreme Court to rule on Trump's bid to roll back birthright citizenship
Supreme Court to rule on Trump's bid to roll back birthright citizenship Decisions are expected this week from the US supreme court that will determine just how far Donald Trump can flex his executive power. But one of the most awaited rulings is on the president's efforts to roll back birthright citizenship. The case was argued in April and a final ruling is awaited on Tuesday. Caroline Baum explains.
scmp 9d ago 74499619… source ↗
US Supreme Court strikes down Trump birthright citizenship order
US Supreme Court strikes down Trump birthright citizenship order In a historic ruling, the US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a Trump administration executive order targeting birthright citizenship, preserving a defining principle of what it means to be born an American. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Barbara, holding that children born in the United States to undocumented parents or parents on temporary visas are entitled to US citizenship. Restricting birthright citizenship has been a cornerstone of US President Donald Trump’s second-term...
gdelt 10d ago 74bb636b… source ↗
Now
Now 80° Wed 97° Thu 99° Supreme Court strikes down Trump's birthright order; upholds state bans on trans athletes in girls' sports. byAUSTIN DENEAN | The National News Desk WASHINGTON (TNND) —The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn birthright citizenship, dealing a blow to his plans to crack down on immigration in the United States. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional. Birthright citizenshipgrants anyone born in the United States American citizenship, regardless of their immigration status, with some exceptions for children of foreign diplomats. It became law in 1868 with the ratification of the 14th Amendment in the aftermath in the civil war. It was expanded in the late 1800s when the Supreme Court ruled a man born in the U.S. to Chinese parents had a right to U.S. citizenship. The high court has made rulings in later cases that anyone born in the country is a citizen regardless of their parents’ immigration status. The 14th Amendment says, “all persons born or naturalized in the U.S., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Lower courts and the S…
gdelt 9d ago 755daca9… source ↗
UNITED STATES engaged diplomatically CITIZEN in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago 766b8495… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in a decision far closer than it should be. #SCOTUS #citizenship
gdelt 10d ago 791a0aec… source ↗
ADMINISTRATION consulted UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
A divided US Supreme Court has upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the United States, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The 6-3rulingmarked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a ‌major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his global tariffs. "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights - to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, "We keep that promise today". The justices upheld a lower court's decision that blocked Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is a US citizen or legal pe…
gdelt 9d ago 79868f5e… source ↗
UNITED STATES assaulted UNITED STATES in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
alarabiya 9d ago 799d3be1… source ↗
Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict birthright citizenship
Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict birthright citizenship Handing President Donald Trump a stinging defeat, the US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected his audacious attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States – a right long woven into the fabric of American society – scuttling one of his top priorities in his crackdown on immigration.The 6–3 ruling marked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his sweeping global tariffs.For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.The justices upheld a lower court’s decision that blocked Trump’s executive order directing US agencies not to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident, also called a “green card” holder.Challengers to Trump’s order argued that it violates language in the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that confers citizenship to those born in the United States
gdelt 10d ago 7b8555f3… source ↗
Now
Now 80° Wed 97° Thu 99° Supreme Court strikes down Trump's birthright order; upholds state bans on trans athletes in girls' sports. byAUSTIN DENEAN | The National News Desk WASHINGTON (TNND) —The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn birthright citizenship, dealing a blow to his plans to crack down on immigration in the United States. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional. Birthright citizenshipgrants anyone born in the United States American citizenship, regardless of their immigration status, with some exceptions for children of foreign diplomats. It became law in 1868 with the ratification of the 14th Amendment in the aftermath in the civil war. It was expanded in the late 1800s when the Supreme Court ruled a man born in the U.S. to Chinese parents had a right to U.S. citizenship. The high court has made rulings in later cases that anyone born in the country is a citizen regardless of their parents’ immigration status. The 14th Amendment says, “all persons born or naturalized in the U.S., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Lower courts and the S…
bluesky 10d ago 7f9eb386… source ↗
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a major birthright citizenship ruling within days, and one constitutional law expert says recent decisions have raised new questions about how far the justices m...
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a major birthright citizenship ruling within days, and one constitutional law expert says recent decisions have raised new questions about how far the justices may be willing to go. #SupremeCourt #Politics #BreakingNews
gdelt 10d ago 8443117a… source ↗
UNITED STATES made statement UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
bluesky 9d ago 8751286d… source ↗
BREAKING: The Supreme Court is projected to strike down Trump's birthright citizenship ban this morning. 95% chance.
bluesky 9d ago 895c3c94… source ↗
Breaking!! 🚨🚨 Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits 👏👏🇺🇸 “The justices relied on a long settled understanding of the 14th Amendment in ruling that anyone b...
Breaking!! 🚨🚨 Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits 👏👏🇺🇸 “The justices relied on a long settled understanding of the 14th Amendment in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen.” apnews.com/article/supr...
websearch 89b0e37a… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's ...
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's ... Visitors wait to enter U.S. Supreme Court on June 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. Tom Brenner | Getty Images Create an account or log in to save stories. Log in Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories. Show me! Save Share X (twitter.com) Facebook Mail Hot rotisserie chicken soon could be among the foods eligible under federal food benefits Tarantula-tossing candidate running for U.S. Senate sentenced to workhouse over 2024 incident Nationally watched lawsuit has judge weighing future of Minnesota ban on prediction markets Trump visits newly built Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library in North Dakota's Badlands
bluesky 9d ago 8b657887… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court UPHOLDS Birthright Citizenship! More to come...
gdelt 10d ago 8e99976e… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
bluesky 9d ago 8ebc34ce… source ↗
Phew. Expected, but still a relief! This is breaking but the supreme court has upheld birthright citizenship, which provides nearly all people born in the country with citizenship, ruling against a ce...
Phew. Expected, but still a relief! This is breaking but the supreme court has upheld birthright citizenship, which provides nearly all people born in the country with citizenship, ruling against a central piece of Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda. Thank God.
gdelt 9d ago 918b50fa… source ↗
SUPREME COURT appealed in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
dw 9d ago 92d90b5a… source ↗
US top court backs birthright citizenship in rebuke to Trump
US top court backs birthright citizenship in rebuke to Trump US President Donald Trump had issued an executive order that would have changed constitutional guarantees that people born on US soil are citizens.
bluesky 9d ago 936ff351… source ↗
Supreme Court Draws the Line on Birthright Citizenship The Morning Sixpack Podcast - 06/30/2026: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s birthright citizenship order, expands executive power, Medicare GLP-1s...
Supreme Court Draws the Line on Birthright Citizenship The Morning Sixpack Podcast - 06/30/2026: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s birthright citizenship order, expands executive power, Medicare GLP-1s, AI scams and NBCU merger buzz. #MorningSixpackPodcast
aljazeera 9d ago 93ec089f… source ↗
US Supreme Court rules against Trump order to end birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rules against Trump order to end birthright citizenship This is a breaking news story.
websearch 95682548… source ↗
Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship ...
Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship ... The 6-3 ruling reaffirms more than a century of legal precedent. The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's attempt toend birthright citizenshipin the U.S. by executive order, reaffirming in a 6-3 ruling more than a century of legal precedent and national tradition that babies born on American soil are automatically American citizens. The decision is a blow to Trump, who had lobbied the court to uphold his Day 1 order and attended oral arguments in the case, becoming the first sitting president to do so. Trump had argued that children born to unlawful immigrants and temporary visitors, like tourists and foreign students, do not qualify for citizenship under terms of the 14th Amendment, which was enacted after the Civil War to address the status of former slaves and their descendants. Immigrant advocates and civil liberties groups opposing the policy change warned that it would harm hundreds of thousands of children born every year to non-citizen parents and create a bureaucratic nightmare for older Americans, who would no longer be able to prove citizenship simply with a birth certifica…
gdelt 10d ago 959fc06b… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits 24 minutes ago Associated Press , The U.S. Supreme Court is seen Monday, June 29, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib) WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, “We keep that promise today.” Three conservative justices would have allowed the restrictions to take effect. “The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstit…
bluesky 9d ago 971f1b30… source ↗
[BREAKING NEWS] U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Trump on birthright citizenship
scmp 1d ago 98347bdb… source ↗
Trump says he will ask US Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case
Trump says he will ask US Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he would ask the Supreme Court to rehear a case challenging his executive order curtailing birthright citizenship, a long-shot ‌bid to reverse the court’s rejection of one of his signature policies. The court last month rejected Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the US, ruling that his directive violated language in the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that confers ⁠citizenship to those born in the United States who are...
websearch 99853180… source ↗
Birthright citizenship ruling: Supreme Court rejects Trump's proposed ...
Birthright citizenship ruling: Supreme Court rejects Trump's proposed ... The Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship that would have denied citizenship to children born to mothers who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The U.S. Supreme Court is seen Monday, June 29, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib) WASHINGTON (AP) — A dividedSupreme Courton Tuesday upheld a broad conception ofbirthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump’s order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding ofthe 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Robe…
websearch 99d60cfc… source ↗
What did the Supreme Court rule on birthright citizenship?
What did the Supreme Court rule on birthright citizenship? IMMIGRATION Birthright Citizenship Add Topic Arizona advocates cheer Supreme Court birthright citizenship decision Daniel Gonzalez Arizona Republic Updated June 30, 2026, 3:26 p.m. ET Hear this story Immigrant advocates in Arizona applauded the Supreme Court's ruling on Tuesday, June 30, which rejected President Donald Trump's executive order that sought to block children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants from automatically becoming citizens. The Supreme Court's justices ruled 6-3 against the president's executive order, stating that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. "It would have been disastrous," had the Supreme Court upheld Trump's executive order, said Delia Salvatierra, a Phoenix immigration attorney. "It would have upended people's lives, people's futures. People were very afraid." The Supreme Court's ruling was based on the words and meaning of 14th Amendment, not policy or political considerations or "siding with undoc…
timesofindia 9d ago 9a223492… source ↗
Born in the USA: Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship
Born in the USA: Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship The US Supreme Court has delivered a significant blow to President Trump's executive order, upholding birthright citizenship for children born on American soil to undocumented or temporary visa holders. In a 6-3 decision, the court affirmed that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to nearly all individuals born in the U.S., reaffirming over a century of legal precedent. This ruling removes a key immigration initiative from the administration's agenda.
gdelt 9d ago 9ac4d1d0… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 10d ago 9c578a0a… source ↗
NATURALIZED assaulted UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits There are 3 cases we are watching out for today the future of birthright citizenship and 2 cases regarding transgender sports participation. Both decisions could be released in just *** couple of hours. Birthright citizenship grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil under the 14th Amendment. This was challenged on the first day of President Donald Trump's 2nd term. When he signed an executive order to invalidate how the amendments interpreted, the president's order would deny citizenship to anyone born in the US on or after February 19, 2025 whose parents are in the country illegally or temporarily. Experts argue the decision could impact *** quarter of *** million children born in the US each year. The Supreme Court's also expected to release. *** decision soon on cases that challenge laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on their grade school and college sports teams. More than 2 dozen Republican-led states, including Idaho and West Virginia, have enacted bans on transgender athletes …
websearch 9c5b526b… source ↗
Birthright citizenship, other major Supreme Court rulings coming soon
Birthright citizenship, other major Supreme Court rulings coming soon POLITICS Supreme Court of the United States Add Topic Big Supreme Court rulings near on birthright citizenship, Trump power Maureen Groppe USA TODAY June 17, 2026 Updated June 18, 2026, 11:01 a.m. ET Hear this story WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court is heading into the homestretch for its biggest cases of the term, with potentially landmark opinions still to come as early as June 18 on issues ranging from presidential power to culture war fights to birthright citizenship . The justices are expected to hand down 20 remaining decisions in the coming days as they aim to wrap up by the end of the month. The court doesn’t announce in advance which decisions are coming and often drops the blockbusters in the final days before its summer recess. Here’s a look at the biggest outstanding cases. Birthright citizenship After the Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s tariffs in January, the president predicted the justices would also strike down his effort to sharply limit who qualifies for automatic U.S. citizenship. Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his second term directing federal agencies …
npr 9d ago 9df986cb… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds The decision firmly rejected the executive order that Trump issued on the first day of his second term.
websearch 9e471715… source ↗
Supreme Court strikes down Trump's order ending birthright citizenship ...
Supreme Court strikes down Trump's order ending birthright citizenship ... (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images) Updated on June 30 at 1:55 p.m. The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship to virtually everyone born in the United States. In a decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, in Trump v. Barbara , the justices agreed with the challengers, as well as all of the lower courts around the country that have considered the issue, that Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.” In a dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling both “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendm…
triblive 9d ago 9f42ccc8… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits <p>WASHINGTON &#8212; A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump&#8217;s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.</p>
gdelt 9d ago a1504732… source ↗
UNITED STATES assaulted PRESIDENT in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 9d ago a20021ec… source ↗
Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make aquick donationto Truthout today!
Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make aquick donationto Truthout today! After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to redefine birthright citizenship through executive order on Tuesday, Trump demanded that Congress pass a law rescinding birthright citizenship rights instead. The birthright citizenship clauseof the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads, in part, that: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. Trump’s executive order, issued on the first day of his second term in office, sought to define “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” as meaning that children born in the country to non-citizen parents were not technically subject to U.S. jurisdiction. On Tuesday, five justices of the Supreme Court rejected that argument. Chief Justice John Roberts, who penned the majority opinion,dismissed argumentsby Trump and his allies that the 14th Amendmentwas written solely to address the issue of freed Black Americansfollowing the Civil War. The “goal” of the amendment, Roberts wrote, including …
websearch a235d87c… source ↗
Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to limit birthright citizenship
Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to limit birthright citizenship Add NBC News to Google Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to limit birthright citizenship 01:47 Get more news Live on Share Add NBC News to Google June 30, 2026, 10:36 AM EDT / Updated June 30, 2026, 11:15 AM EDT By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump’s contentious attempt to limit citizenship at birth for those born on U.S. soil, delivering a major blow to his agenda. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading. The court, divided 6-3, ruled that the executive order Trump issued Jan. 20, 2025, the first day of his second term, was unlawful. Five justices said the order fell foul of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which has long been interpreted to bestow birthright citizenship on almost anyone born in the United States. One justice, conservative Brett Kavanaugh, said the order violated federal law but not the Constitution. It is the third significant Supreme Court loss for Trump in recent months, following the February ruling that invalidated his sweeping tariffs and Monday’s decision that barre…
bluesky 9d ago a2927c48… source ↗
BREAKING: The Supreme Court is projected to strike down Trump's birthright citizenship ban this morning. 95% chance.
wtae 10d ago a2f786e9… source ↗
Supreme Court set to release decisions on birthright citizenship and presidential power
Supreme Court set to release decisions on birthright citizenship and presidential power <p>The Supreme Court is expected to release decisions on cases involving birthright citizenship and the president's authority to dismiss federal officials.</p>
gdelt 9d ago a353c53f… source ↗
How the Supreme Court became a pivotal force in Trump's immigration agenda
How the Supreme Court became a pivotal force in Trump's immigration agenda Rebecca Santana Associated Press Published: July 1, 2026 at 7:37 AM Full Screen 1 / 3 Previous photo Next photo Activists celebrate the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling outside of the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, June 30, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., center, and other Democratic House members react to the Supreme Court's decision to uphold birthright citizenship at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 30, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, June 29, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) Activists celebrate the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling outside of the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, June 30, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's administration looked to the Supreme Court to greenlight its sweeping hard-line immigration agenda and, by and large, it got the backing it was looking for with one key exception — birthright ci…
websearch a49b4853… source ↗
Supreme Court decisions: Trump reacts to birthright citizenship ruling
Supreme Court decisions: Trump reacts to birthright citizenship ruling POLITICS Supreme Court of the United States Add Topic Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, allows trans athlete bans Maureen Groppe Bart Jansen Aysha Bagchi Trevor Hughes Erin Mansfield Sarah D. Wire USA TODAY Updated June 30, 2026, 8:25 p.m. ET WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that all children born in the United States are citizens, upholding what has been one of the country’s bedrock principles for more than 125 years and handing President Donald Trump a loss on one of his top priorities. Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his second term to limit citizenship to children born to citizens or legal permanent residents, rather than tourists or undocumented immigrants. But the high court has interpreted the Constitution’s 14th Amendment — ratified in 1868 and upheld in a ruling in 1898 — as granting citizenship to all babies born in the country, regardless of parentage. After the ruling, Trump urged Congress to adopt his citizenship restrictions through legislation. In another decision Tuesday, the court ruled 6-3 to allow West Virginia and Idaho to ban transgender athlet…
bluesky 8d ago a71edcf0… source ↗
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejects Trump’s Order Full Story: indiawest.com/supreme-cour... #BirthrightCitizenship #SupremeCourt #DonaldTrump #USSupremeCourt #Immigration #USPoliti...
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejects Trump’s Order Full Story: indiawest.com/supreme-cour... #BirthrightCitizenship #SupremeCourt #DonaldTrump #USSupremeCourt #Immigration #USPolitics #Constitution #14thAmendment #BreakingNews #TopStories #NewsUpdate #IndiaWest #USNews
gdelt 10d ago a7e865e1… source ↗
ADMINISTRATION made statement THE US in New Hampshire, United States
Story audio is generated using AI By Andrew Chung Washington — The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a stinging defeat on Tuesday, rejecting his audacious attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the US — a right long woven into the fabric of American society — scuttling a priority in his crackdown on immigration. The 6-3 ruling marked the second time this year the court has invalidated a major Trump initiative; in February it struck down his sweeping global tariffs. The justices upheld a lower court’s decision that blocked Trump’s executive order directing state agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident. Challengers to Trump’s order argued that it violates language in the US constitution’s 14th Amendment that confers citizenship to those born in the US who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. Trump, who has repeatedly tested the limits of presidential power in domestic and foreign policy, issued the order last year on his first day back in office as part of a suite of policies to crack down on legal and illegal immigration. Critics have accused him of racial and …
bluesky 9d ago aa1a4ad8… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules against Trump on birthright citizenship, holding that the EO limiting right for for children of certain immigrants does not comply with the 14th Amendment
gdelt 9d ago aab1b8e3… source ↗
SUPREME COURT appealed UNITED STATES in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 9d ago aabd330d… source ↗
WASHINGTON rejected PRESIDENT in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
france24 8d ago aba2652b… source ↗
Fact-checking Donald Trump's birthright citizenship claims
Fact-checking Donald Trump's birthright citizenship claims The US Supreme Court has dealt a major blow to Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, ruling children born in the US are citizens under the Constitution regardless of their parents' immigration status. The decision also casts fresh scrutiny on Trump's repeated claims about the policy, including that the US is the only country with birthright citizenship and that it's driving widespread abuse.
websearch afcd20cd… source ↗
Supreme Court Ruling on Birthright Citizenship: What to Know
Supreme Court Ruling on Birthright Citizenship: What to Know By Mandy Taheri Politics & Culture Reporter 0 Share Newsweek is a Trust Project member See more of our trusted coverage when you search. Prefer Newsweek on Google to see more of our trusted coverage when you search. The Supreme Court is poised to rule on the future of birthright citizenship, a decision that promises to be its most consequential since the overturning of abortion rights jurisprudence in 2022. The ruling in Trump vs Barbara , which will be announced in the coming days as the Court wraps up its term, touches all the most important themes of Trump’s political career—a hard line on immigration, an expansive view of executive power and a willingness to challenge norms that have guided American public life for decades. Trump is not optimistic about a ruling in his favor after conservative justices sounded skeptical during oral arguments. Nonetheless, with waves of illegal immigration testing the limits of a federal right initially designed to protect freed slaves after the Civil War, the case is also shaping up to be a test of how much the Supreme Court’s six conservative justices will stand up to the president …
bbc 9d ago b40e96d6… source ↗
Supreme Court's birthright ruling is major blow to Trump
Supreme Court's birthright ruling is major blow to Trump The BBC’s Gary O’Donoghue explains what the court's landmark ruling means for the US president.
gdelt 9d ago b4a66d1c… source ↗
WASHINGTON rejected UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago b553bac4… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court hands Trump HUGE defeat on Birthright Citizenship. A major victory for immigration, democracy and the rule of law...
gdelt 10d ago b61e4e33… source ↗
UNITED STATES made statement UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
hindustantimes 9d ago b6b5b3b3… source ↗
Supreme Court to rule on Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship: Key thing to know
Supreme Court to rule on Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship: Key thing to know The U.S. Supreme Court will decide if Trump can limit birthright citizenship, a major immigration issue.
gdelt 10d ago bb38a7b5… source ↗
UNITED STATES assaulted UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Open this photo in gallery: Police officers stand outside the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington on Tuesday. Birthright citizenship was the first Trump immigration-related policy to reach the court for a final ruling. Cheney Orr/Reuters Share Save for later Please log in to bookmark this story. Log In Create Free Account A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, “We keep that promise today.” Three conservative justices would have allowed the re…
indianexpress 9d ago bb3cbe17… source ↗
US Supreme Court rules against Trump’s attempt to limit birthright citizenship
hindustantimes 22d ago bcf2b398… source ↗
Trump's biggest Supreme Court test this term? Birthright citizenship, immigration rulings among key cases
Trump's biggest Supreme Court test this term? Birthright citizenship, immigration rulings among key cases The Supreme Court is set to rule on key cases influencing Trump's immigration policies and presidential powers.&nbsp;
gdelt 10d ago bd632e1b… source ↗
NPR National News
NPR National News Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds NPR | By Nina Totenberg Published June 30, 2026 at 10:38 AM EDT Bluesky Threads Email Drew Angerer / Getty Images The U.S. Supreme Court Listen to NPR's live special coverage of the decision Loading... In a sharp rebuke to President Trump, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Constitution guarantees automatic birthright citizenship to virtually all children born in the United States. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court's 6-3 opinion. The decision firmly rejected the executive order that Trump issued on the first day of his second term. It sought to bar citizenship for babies born in the U.S. to parents who either entered the country illegally or who are living and working here legally with temporary visas. The executive order never went into effect because every lower court judge who reviewed it concluded, in the words of one judge, that it was "blatantly unconstitutional." Trump has long maintained that the Constitution does not guarantee birthright citizenship. But as Chief Justice Roberts observed, the men who wrote the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution…
bluesky 9d ago bd9abf12… source ↗
In breaking news, a 6-3 Majority of the US Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roberts, has rejected Trump’s efforts to rip away birthright citizenship from children born in this country to parents wh...
In breaking news, a 6-3 Majority of the US Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roberts, has rejected Trump’s efforts to rip away birthright citizenship from children born in this country to parents who are here in violation of immigration law or here temporarily.... youtu.be/TQPxKu4wXkM?...
bluesky 9d ago bfb8319f… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects Trump effort to limit birthright citizenship. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
websearch c4459697… source ↗
Birthright citizenship was for children of slaves, not for world to ...
Birthright citizenship was for children of slaves, not for world to ... Synopsis President Donald Trump stated that birthright citizenship was intended for the children of slaves, not for global immigrants. He expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would support his stance after a court struck down his executive order. Republicans have proposed a bill to restrict citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and non-immigrants on temporary visas. Trump says birthright citizenship was for children of slaves, not for world to 'pile' into US President Donald Trump has said that birthright citizenship was primarily intended for the children of slaves and not for the whole world to "come in and pile" into the US. On the very first day of his inauguration, Trump issued an executive order against birthright citizenship , which was struck down by a federal court in Seattle the next day. Trump has said that he would appeal against it. On Thursday, he exuded confidence that the Supreme Court would rule in his favour. "Birthright citizenship was, if you look back when this was passed and made, that was meant for the children of slaves. This was not meant for the whole world to come in …
aljazeera 9d ago c4d70be0… source ↗
SCOTUS rules against Trump’s order limiting birthright citizenship
SCOTUS rules against Trump’s order limiting birthright citizenship The US Supreme Court has blocked President Donald Trump&#039;s executive order to end birthright citizenship.
france24 9d ago c6e170ba… source ↗
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship The US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship in a blow to one of his signature anti-immigration initiatives. The court, in an eagerly awaited decision on the final day of its term, ruled 6-3 to maintain the right to American citizenship for nearly everyone born on US soil. FRANCE 24's Eliza Herbert reports.
websearch c7948758… source ↗
Trump Birthright Citizenship Order: Supreme Court Case 2026
Trump Birthright Citizenship Order: Supreme Court Case 2026 Key Takeaways Executive Order 14160, signed January 20, 2025 , seeks to deny automatic U.S. citizenship to children born after February 19, 2025, if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. Every federal court that has reviewed the order has blocked it — the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara on April 1, 2026 , with a ruling expected by late June. The executive order remains completely blocked by multiple preliminary injunctions and has never been enforced — all children born in the U.S. continue to receive citizenship under the 14th Amendment. On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14160 within hours of taking office, directing federal agencies to stop recognizing automatic U.S. citizenship for certain children born on American soil. The order targets babies born on or after February 19, 2025, whose parents are both non-citizens — specifically, children born to mothers present in the country without legal status or on temporary visas, where the father is also not a citizen or lawful permanent resident. The executive order immediately triggered a wave of legal …
gdelt 9d ago c7ded147… source ↗
WASHINGTON rejected UNITED STATES in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 10d ago c8d3c560… source ↗
UNITED STATES consulted ADMINISTRATION in New Hampshire, United States
A divided US Supreme Court has upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the United States, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The 6-3rulingmarked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a ‌major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his global tariffs. "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights - to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, "We keep that promise today". The justices upheld a lower court's decision that blocked Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is a US citizen or legal pe…
tass 9d ago c9b15f3d… source ↗
US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship
US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship Five of the six judges pointed out that the right was enshrined in the US Constitution
websearch cdf9dbd2… source ↗
Birthright citizenship ruling live updates: Supreme Court rejects Trump ...
Birthright citizenship ruling live updates: Supreme Court rejects Trump ... Live outside the U.S. Supreme Court as it’s set to rule on the constitutionality of President Trump’s order on birthright citizenship declaring that children born to parents who are in country illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. What to know: “The Justices rightly recognized that the U.S. Constitution is clear and unambiguous: if you are born in this country and subject to its jurisdiction, you are a citizen of this country,” Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, the head of Global Refuge, a non-profit that works with immigrants, said in a statement. “Birthright citizenship survived the Chinese Exclusion Act, Jim Crow, and today, it survived an executive order that would have essentially turned the maternity ward into a customs checkpoint.” “Today, the Supreme Court defended the soul of this country and the very definition of what it means to be an American,” Voto Latino President Maria Teresa Kumar said in a statement. She added: “By reaffirming that every child born on American soil is a citizen, the court chose to embrace our multiracial and multicultural reality, rather than succumb to a politic…
guardian 9d ago cf07baad… source ↗
US supreme court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump agenda
US supreme court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump agenda <p>Court rules against<strong> </strong>Trump administration on policy that people born in the United States are citizens</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/17/sign-up-for-the-breaking-news-us-email-to-get-newsletter-alerts-direct-to-your-inbox?utm_medium=ACQUISITIONS_STANDFIRST&amp;utm_campaign=BN22326&amp;utm_content=signup&amp;utm_term=standfirst&amp;utm_source=GUARDIAN_WEB">Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox</a></p></li></ul><p>The US supreme court has upheld birthright citizenship, which provides nearly all people born in the country with citizenship, ruling against a central piece of Donald Trump’s <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/usimmigration">anti-immigrant agenda</a>.</p><p>The president had issued an executive order on the first day of his second term that sought to undo birthright citizenship. The order would override the US constitution, which it cannot do, though his administration has argued the order instead interprets the constitution correctly.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/30/us-s…
gdelt 10d ago d20c9eea… source ↗
Unattributed party appealed CONGRESS in White House, District of Columbia, United States
News National Politics Actions Facebook Tweet Email Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case on the first day of his second term. Prev Next The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case. (Scripps News) By: Scripps News Group Posted and last updated The Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship for children born in the United States, including those born to undocumented migrants. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | States can ban transgender athletes from participating in women's sports, Supreme Court rules The ruling was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the court's three liberal justices in the majority. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment in part and dissented in part, while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The decision is a major blow for President Donald Trump, who signed the executive order at the center of the case on the first day of his second term…
gdelt 9d ago d30680b4… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago d37c2bc9… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump's Extreme Agenda - Discussion with Rep. Veronica Escobar, Olivia Troye and Adam Klasfeld open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
bbc 9d ago d4928f61… source ↗
Supreme Court's birthright ruling is major blow to Trump
Supreme Court's birthright ruling is major blow to Trump The BBC’s Gary O’Donoghue explains what the court's landmark ruling means for the US president.
france24 8d ago d4e154b4… source ↗
'Trump not going to give up easily' on bid to restrict birthright citizenship despite SCOTUS stop
'Trump not going to give up easily' on bid to restrict birthright citizenship despite SCOTUS stop The US Supreme Court on June 30 rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship in a blow to one of his signature anti-immigration initiatives. This comes after Trump had signed an executive order on the first day of his presidency decreeing those born to parents in the US illegally or on temporary visas could not automatically become Americans. FRANCE 24's Philip Turle tells us more on how important that decision is.
bangkokpost 9d ago d55e5d23… source ↗
Trump loses fight to curb birthright citizenship
Trump loses fight to curb birthright citizenship WASHINGTON - Handing President Donald Trump a stinging defeat, the US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected his audacious attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States &mdash; a right long woven into the fabric of American society &mdash; scuttling ​one of his top priorities in his crackdown on immigration.
timesofindia 9d ago d5f5bdca… source ↗
Big blow to Trump: US Supreme Court junks executive order restricting birthright citizenship
gdelt 9d ago d6e74b1f… source ↗
Unattributed party consulted UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 9d ago da0c73d5… source ↗
SUPREME COURT rejected UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
bluesky 9d ago dc19d5d4… source ↗
BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court rules that Trump cannot unilaterally upend birthright citizenship through executive order. The clause in the 14th Amendment remains intact. Full story to come...
BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court rules that Trump cannot unilaterally upend birthright citizenship through executive order. The clause in the 14th Amendment remains intact. Full story to come...stay tuned.
websearch dd0a3e19… source ↗
Birthright Citizenship Supreme Court ruling expected Monday - WMUR
Birthright Citizenship Supreme Court ruling expected Monday - WMUR Birthright Citizenship Supreme Court ruling expected this week Birthright Citizenship Supreme Court ruling expected this week TO BOSTON, JUST ABOUT 37 MINUTES OR SO. NOT BAD OUT THERE. WELL, THE SUPREME COURT IS EXPECTED TO END ITS TERM THIS WEEK, AND THE JUSTICES WILL LIKELY RULE ON SOME PRETTY BIG CASES, INCLUDING ONE THAT BEGAN HERE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. OUR RICKY PODGORSKI JOINS US. HE’S IN OUR STUDIO THIS MORNING, AND THE SUPREME COURT IS SET TO WEIGH IN ON WHETHER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP CAN END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. THAT’S RIGHT. SEAN. AND THE PRESIDENT SIGNED AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHEN HE BEGAN HIS SECOND TERM TO END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. THE SUPREME COURT IS EXPECTED TO COME TO A DECISION ON THIS ORDER TODAY. THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WAS ONE OF MANY GROUPS ACROSS THE COUNTRY THAT FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE INITIAL ORDER. BACK AND FORTH LEGAL ACTION IN THE GRANITE STATE LED TO A NEW HAMPSHIRE FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKING THE EXECUTIVE ORDER AND GRANTING THE GROUP’S REQUEST FOR A LAWSUIT. THE SUPREME COURT IS ALSO EXPECTED TO DECIDE IF THE PRESIDENT’S ATTEMPT TO FIRE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD G…
gdelt 7d ago dd988546… source ↗
Supreme Court whiffs on birthright citizenship
Supreme Court whiffs on birthright citizenship By Andy Schlafly July 2, 2026 The Supreme Court just blundered badly on birthright citizenship, undermining the credibility of the Court while devaluing American citizenship. By a mere 5-4 majority, the Court declared a new constitutional right to citizenship for millions of children of illegal aliens, tourists and those on worker visas, which was never intended by anyone who wrote the U.S. Constitution. This decision suddenly grants a future right to vote to millions of illegal aliens , tilting the outcomes of elections away from the candidates preferred by native-born or naturalized American citizens. Chief Justice John Roberts, who is on the Court only because millions of illegal aliens were not allowed to vote in 2004, wrote a decision that hands the future of the United States over to the children of illegal aliens and other foreign citizens . The notion that the 14th Amendment, which was ratified nearly 160 years ago in response to the Civil War, somehow requires this result is unfathomable. As Justice Thomas explained in his 91-page dissent, this is another judicial distortion of the meaning of a constitutional amendment whose p…
gdelt 9d ago e27cf19f… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…
gdelt 10d ago e3f6096a… source ↗
CITIZEN made statement UNITED STATES in New Hampshire, United States
A divided US Supreme Court has upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the United States, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The 6-3rulingmarked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a ‌major Trump initiative, following its February decision to strike down his global tariffs. "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights - to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, "We keep that promise today". The justices upheld a lower court's decision that blocked Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is a US citizen or legal pe…
bluesky 10d ago e43a4a8b… source ↗
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a major birthright citizenship ruling within days, and one constitutional law expert says recent decisions have raised new questions about how far the justices m...
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a major birthright citizenship ruling within days, and one constitutional law expert says recent decisions have raised new questions about how far the justices may be willing to go. #SupremeCourt #Politics #BreakingNews
wtae 9d ago e5053da9… source ↗
Supreme Court could rule on birthright citizenship, transgender sports cases today
Supreme Court could rule on birthright citizenship, transgender sports cases today <p>The Supreme Court is expected to release decisions on birthright citizenship and laws barring transgender girls and women from participating in school sports teams.</p>
bbc 9d ago e56c4897… source ↗
US Supreme Court has dealt heavy defeats to Trump, while expanding his power
US Supreme Court has dealt heavy defeats to Trump, while expanding his power The birthright ruling brings to an end a Supreme Court term that has delivered the president some key victories.
bluesky 9d ago e837d2c0… source ↗
The Supreme Court has voted to uphold birthright citizenship. Donald Trump had filed an executive order to attempt to deny automatic American citizenship to children born to parents that are in the U...
The Supreme Court has voted to uphold birthright citizenship. Donald Trump had filed an executive order to attempt to deny automatic American citizenship to children born to parents that are in the U.S. illegally.
wtae 9d ago e87ba9be… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship <p>The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled to uphold birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's proposed limits on the right.</p>
gdelt 10d ago e8f084e9… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
aljazeera 9d ago e8f5d9a5… source ↗
Birthright citizenship ruling: US officials, lawmakers and advocates react
Birthright citizenship ruling: US officials, lawmakers and advocates react Trump calls top court&#039;s ruling affirming birthright citizenship &#039;too bad for country&#039; as advocates cheer decision.
bluesky 9d ago e938bdcf… source ↗
Breaking: The US Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, preventing it from taking effect.
websearch ea12661d… source ↗
Angry Trump lambasts Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision ...
Angry Trump lambasts Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision ... PresidentDonald Trumphas urged Congress to take action following the Supreme Court's decision to uphold birthright citizenship, which invalidated an executive order aimed at restricting these protections. Trumpasserted that children born to parents residing in the United States illegally or on a temporary basis do not qualify as American citizens. "The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process,” Trump stated on Truth Social soon after the Supreme Court's ruling. He added, “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country,BirthrightCitizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!” In the court's view, Chief Justice Roberts stated that there is "scant evidence" supporting the Trump administration's "dramatically revisionist view" on the 14th Amendment and the restrictions regarding citizenship at birth. Also Read:Want US citi…
gdelt 10d ago eaf34f93… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits There are 3 cases we are watching out for today the future of birthright citizenship and 2 cases regarding transgender sports participation. Both decisions could be released in just *** couple of hours. Birthright citizenship grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil under the 14th Amendment. This was challenged on the first day of President Donald Trump's 2nd term. When he signed an executive order to invalidate how the amendments interpreted, the president's order would deny citizenship to anyone born in the US on or after February 19, 2025 whose parents are in the country illegally or temporarily. Experts argue the decision could impact *** quarter of *** million children born in the US each year. The Supreme Court's also expected to release. *** decision soon on cases that challenge laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on their grade school and college sports teams. More than 2 dozen Republican-led states, including Idaho and West Virginia, have enacted bans on transgender athletes …
websearch ed71ff59… source ↗
Supreme Court rejects Trump's birthright citizenship changes
Supreme Court rejects Trump's birthright citizenship changes POLITICS Donald Trump Add Topic Supreme Court rejects Trump's birthright citizenship order in major blow The justices said President Donald Trump cannot change the definition of birthright citizenship with the stroke of a pen. Maureen Groppe USA TODAY Updated June 30, 2026, 10:56 a.m. ET Hear this story WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on June 30 rejected President Donald Trump ’s attempt to redefine who is an American , striking down the limits on birthright citizenship that were a centerpiece of his hardline approach to immigration . The ruling landed as the nation is gearing up to celebrate its 250 th anniversary, adding to the significance of a case that was already a blockbuster. And it came months after the court killed Trump’s signature tariffs , another repudiation of the expansive authority Trump has claimed since returning to the White House last year. But in other immigration cases, including last week’s ruling allowing Trump to end deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, the justices backed the president’s authority. In their latest decision, however, the justices said Trump cannot chan…
websearch ee14292c… source ↗
Rochester, NY leaders hail Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling
Rochester, NY leaders hail Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling POLITICS Kathy Hochul Add Topic Rochester leaders celebrate Supreme Court birthright ruling Kayla Canne Kerria Weaver Rochester Democrat and Chronicle June 30, 2026 Updated July 1, 2026, 12:13 p.m. ET Hear this story The Supreme Court on June 30 rejected President Donald Trump's attempt to redefine who is an American , striking down the limits on birthright citizenship that were a centerpiece of his hardline approach to immigration. In a 6-3 ruling, the court found that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily in the country are citizens under the 14th Amendment. Rochester-area lawmakers and advocacy groups celebrated the decision June 30. Rochester City Council President Miguel Melendez called the ruling a "victory for both our immigrant communities and for the constitutional soul of our country." "It is a shame we even had to have this conversation ...," he said in a statement. "The objective seemed to be less about what the Constitution clearly states and more about bullying people and trying to intimidate folks through threats to take away their citizenship." New York …
bbc 8d ago eeecf7b5… source ↗
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in blow to Trump The ruling is a major setback for Donald Trump's immigration agenda, and has been welcomed by civil rights groups.
websearch f06bda87… source ↗
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship - HuffPost
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship - HuffPost LOADING ERROR LOADING The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution’s guarantee that those born in the United States are automatically U.S. citizens, rejecting President Donald Trump ’s attempt to rewrite one of the most sacred laws in the U.S. “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 ruling released Tuesday. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Advertisement Citizenship, according to the chief justice, has been defined as having rights to “freely participate in our political community.” “The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today,” he wrote. The 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” Advertisement “Th…
bluesky 9d ago f09f0efe… source ↗
BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict birthright citizenship reut.rs/44o9RGJ
aljazeera 8d ago f35acd27… source ↗
Why is MAGA in meltdown over the Supreme Court birthright ruling?
Why is MAGA in meltdown over the Supreme Court birthright ruling? The US Supreme Court has rejected Trump’s bid to stop the children of some immigrants obtaining US citizenship at birth.
bluesky 8d ago f553bb79… source ↗
The #SupremeCourt upheld #birthrightcitizenship 6-3, striking down Trump's order denying citizenship to children of undocumented and temporary immigrants. #WTFWire, #Trump, #DonaldTrump, #USSupremeCo...
The #SupremeCourt upheld #birthrightcitizenship 6-3, striking down Trump's order denying citizenship to children of undocumented and temporary immigrants. #WTFWire, #Trump, #DonaldTrump, #USSupremeCourt, #Immigration #ConstitutionalLaw, #BreakingNews, #USNews, www.wtfwire.com/politics/sup...
websearch f604883f… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order - CNBC
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order - CNBC TheSupreme Courton Tuesday upheld the right tocitizenshipfor people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by PresidentDonald Trumpthat sought to undo that long-standing constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants. "Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause," the majority decision written by Chief JusticeJohn Robertssaid. The citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was adopted in 1868, says, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court's three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority opinion on 14th Amendment grounds. Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump's executiv…
websearch f6cd249d… source ↗
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's ...
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's ... By Mark Sherman / Associated Press WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment. “We keep that promise today.” Three conservative justices would have allowed the restrictions to take effect. “The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President’s Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal…
hindu 5d ago f7cbd4d9… source ↗
What did SCOTUS rule on birthright citizenship? | Explained
What did SCOTUS rule on birthright citizenship? | Explained Why and how did U.S. President Donald Trump seek to limit birthright citizenship and what did the Supreme Court rule? Has this always been a political issue in the U.S.? What is the link between birthright citizenship and slavery? How has the judgment affected MAGA supporters?
bluesky 9d ago f891f1b5… source ↗
Breaking News: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits #Immigration #DACA #DonaldTrump #ElSalvador #Mexico #Venezuela #Guatemala #Haiti #Asylum #TPS #Visas #ICE...
Breaking News: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits #Immigration #DACA #DonaldTrump #ElSalvador #Mexico #Venezuela #Guatemala #Haiti #Asylum #TPS #Visas #ICE #Migrants #DHS #MassDeportation #SanctuaryCities #ReneeGood #AlexPretti apnews.com/article/supr...
bluesky 9d ago f8f72b56… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump's Extreme Agenda - Discussion with Rep. Veronica Escobar, Olivia Troye and Adam Klasfeld open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
gdelt 10d ago faea444a… source ↗
Share
Share Add Us On Google Add as a preferred source on Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship , rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment , adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen. The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S. During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom . The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of t…
bluesky 9d ago fb70ee45… source ↗
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump's Extreme Agenda - Discussion with Rep. Veronica Escobar, Olivia Troye and Adam Klasfeld #Trump
hindustantimes 9d ago fc3171c7… source ↗
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in a blow to Trump
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship in a blow to Trump The 6-3 ruling marked the second time this year that the court has invalidated a major Donald Trump initiative.
websearch fd2943a3… source ↗
When could Supreme Court rule on birthright citizenship? What we know
When could Supreme Court rule on birthright citizenship? What we know POLITICS Donald Trump Add Topic Still no ruling on Supreme Court birthright case. When could a decision come? Maureen Groppe Cindi Andrews USA TODAY June 25, 2026 Updated June 26, 2026, 4:21 p.m. ET Hear this story One of the most-watched cases of the Supreme Court term is a challenge to President Donald Trump 's effort to sharply limit who qualifies for automatic U.S. citizenship . Trump signed an executive order after his 2025 inauguration directing federal agencies not to recognize the U.S. citizenship of babies born in America if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. The court, which heard arguments in the case in April , did not issue a ruling on birthright citizenship on June 25 , leaving it among the final few decisions to be announced as the term winds down. The Supreme Court said it will issue additional rulings on Monday, June 29, although it doesn't say in advance which. Trump's birthright citizenship executive order is widely viewed as a legal long shot, and he took the extraordinary step of attending oral arguments when the Supreme Court heard the case. The term ends when all opi…
gdelt 9d ago fd48a44c… source ↗
Facebook
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Linkedin Demonstrators hold letters making up the slogan 'Born in the USA = citizen!' outside the Supreme Court building as the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants April 1. Reuters Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save Linkedin WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. By a 6-3 vote, the court struck down Trump's order. A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, "Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land,'" Chie…

Corroboration

rendered 6d ago · 20 items considered across 12 blocs · model Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

No verdict, no pronouncement. The model extracts atomic factual claims with verbatim quotes; every quote is validated against the source text and corroboration is computed by counting how many editorially-opposed blocs assert each fact. 2 fabricated/unverifiable quotes were rejected by the cite-or-die gate.

The spine · 3 facts corroborated across ≥2 opposed blocs

cross-perspective · 2The US Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship.
gulfindiaotherrussiaturkeywestern
alarabiya“Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict birthright citizenship” bluesky“Breaking News: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits” dailysabah“US Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to curb birthright citizenship” france24“The US Supreme Court on June 30 rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship” gdelt“Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits” hindu“U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits” hindustantimes“The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump's order that denied citizenship to children born to undocumented immigrants.” indianexpress“US Supreme Court rules against Trump’s attempt to limit birthright citizenship” npr“The Supreme Court upheld the right of children born on U.S. soil to automatic American citizenship. In so doing, the court rejected President Trump's most aggressive attempt to limit immigration.” tass“US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship” timesofindia“Born in the USA: Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship”
broadly confirmedThe Supreme Court ruled 6-3, holding that children born in the United States to undocumented or temporary‑visa parents are entitled to US citizenship.
chinapakistantech
dawn“ruled 6-3 to maintain the right to American citizenship for nearly everyone born on US soil.” scmp“The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Barbara, holding that children born in the United States to undocumented parents or parents on temporary visas are entitled to US citizenship.” theverge“The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, ruling 6-3 against President Donald Trump's effort to end the longstanding constitutional right via executive order.”
broadly confirmedThe Supreme Court struck down Trump’s executive order that would have denied citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who are not American citizens or legal permanent residents.
chinaotherrussiawestern
dw“US Supreme Court rules against Trump executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship” tass“US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship” scmp“US Supreme Court strikes down Trump birthright citizenship order” gdelt“Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits”

Single-source · 4 — reported by one bloc only (uncorroborated)

The Supreme Court issued its decision on 30 June 2026.
france24
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his second term that would have denied citizenship to children born to parents who were illegally present or on temporary visas.
dawn
Lower courts blocked Trump’s executive order before the Supreme Court decision.
dawn
The Supreme Court’s decision was issued on the final day of its term.
npr

Framing · 4 — loaded language surfaced (spin shown, not adopted)

alarabiya “Handing President Donald Trump a stinging defeat” → audacious attempt
bangkokpost “Handing President Donald Trump a stinging defeat” → audacious attempt
bbc “The birthright ruling brings to an end a Supreme Court term that has delivered the president some key victories.” → blow to Trump's immigration agenda
scmp “In a historic ruling, the US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a Trump administration executive order targeting birthright citizenship” → historic ruling

Entities

Donald Trumpperson United Statesplace United Statesorg Supreme Courtorg US politicsorg one constitutional law expertperson

Related stories · 6 other clusters nearby